A New Civil War Could Lead To A Far More Enduring Disaster, For America And The World, Than The War Between The States

Why a US Civil War could be even more disastrous than the first: When NPR beings to weigh in, it is safe to say that talk of a second American Civil War has officially gone mainstream. Shockingly, however, given the gravity of the topic, much of the current, rancorous debate appears to underestimate the long-term damage that would ensue following a second Civil War. It is therefore crucial that we clarify the reasons why a new Civil War could lead to a far more enduring disaster, for America and the world, than the War Between the States.

The problem with the recent discussion is that, while most analysts correctly point out that a new war would look very different from the last, they draw the wrong lessons from this observation. As the political scientist Barbra F. Walter has recently noted, in a 21st-century war there would no longer be two large armies, wearing uniforms, facing off on the battlefield. Instead, as we have seen in countless civil conflicts around the world since WWII, the environment would be dominated by fluid complexity. Much of the violence would come from ununiformed fighters, motivated by divergent ideologies but fighting for overlapping goals, committing sporadic acts of terror. “Think about Northern Ireland,” Walter said recently on CNN, drawing comparisons to a conflict responsible for approximately 1,900 deaths over the course of several decades.

Yet, we should recognize that highlighting Northern Ireland, or the Ukrainian separatism that has killed 15,000 people since 2014, or related contemporary examples may unintentionally cause the American public to miscalculate about just how dangerous a war would be in the current context. After all, the American Civil War that erupted in 1861 caused over 600,000 deaths and 1.5 million casualties, and many citizens continue to feel that this astronomical price was justified to produce a decisive end to slavery and Southern threats of secession.

The risk is that a considerable segment of public opinion might come to believe that a much smaller price in lives would be equally justified in order to achieve lofty political goals such as, for example, protecting some version of “the American way of life” or “defending our democracy.” Indeed, polls now suggest that as many as 1 in 3 Americans, Democrats and Republicans alike, may be sympathetic to this instrumental view of political violence. This is why it must be made clear that a second Civil War, even if it did prove less deadly – something that cannot be guaranteed – could produce a long-term disaster from which the nation might never truly recover.

First, the international situation is far more precarious than it was in 1861. At that time, many observers expected Great Britain to intervene on behalf of Southern secessionists to protect its cotton supply. Some thought Tsarist Russia would then feel compelled to support the North in order to exert geopolitical pressure on Britain, its rival in Central Asia. In the event, for reasons that remain poorly understood, both European powers declined to become involved in America’s fraternal bloodshed; if they had, the war could have been far more costly and the outcome more ambiguous.

Conditions have changed. Decreases in the cost of international transportation and the evolution of global finance mean that it has never been easier to provide support for groups fighting abroad. Scholars have shown that, in the hundreds of civil wars since World War II, over 60% have been subject to outside intervention.

Outside meddling fractures contemporary civil wars into multiple competing factions, producing conflicts that are nasty, brutish, and long. This is why the average contemporary civil war now lasts over twice as long as civil conflicts did in the past, and four times as long as an average conventional interstate war. It also frequently produces massive civilian death tolls. In the 1860s, America was fortunate, but today foreign rivals that struggle to match the conventional power of the US military appear eager to fan the flames of our domestic political strife, up to the point of domestic collapse. Our febrile latticework of economic, political, and ethnic resentments make this a far easier task than many would care to admit.

Second, unique historical factors limited the economic damage from the first Civil War. For one thing, the major battles were fought mostly in the South, not in the Northern industrial heartland, and the war itself was largely financed by domestic borrowing in the form of “Union bonds” bought by American citizens. Most importantly, the American economy in the 1860s could generate rapid growth simply by building out a basket of technologies that had already been invented in prior decades. For example, the modern railroad was invented in 1825, but construction of the transcontinental railroad was not completed until 1869. The telegraph was invented in 1837, but the first viable transatlantic lines were not laid until 1865 and 1866, respectively. Taken together, these factors meant that, following a Union victory, industry was poised for an enormous expansion.

Again, the situation is more fragile today. The centers of American production and innovation would no longer be geographically immune from violence; indeed, they would be prime targets. The economy writ large is also far more dependent on flows of foreign capital and the ability to attract top global research talent. Widespread instability would certainly raise the cost of borrowing and servicing the United States’ $29 trillion-dollar national debt. It could also make the country less attractive to the best foreign researchers. All this matters because the technologies that will provide economic growth in the near future – things like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and quantum computing – are still in the early stages of innovation and subject to intense international competition. Civil war now would be a long-term economic catastrophe; it might also give authoritarian rivals such as China an insurmountable lead on the technologies that will dominate the future.

All of this means that, no matter how dysfunctional the political process seems to have become, civil war today will never produce a durable solution to the issues that divide Americans. There can be no rerun of 1865, when basic disagreements about slavery and federal power were permanently laid to rest.

This fact bears repeating. As the great military historian John Keegan reminded us, Western thought from the Greeks to Clausewitz and beyond has evinced a fascination with the idea of decisive wars that settle lingering political disputes once and for all.  Alas, history is seldom this tidy. Most wars drag on while the underlying issues remain unresolved. Exhaustion may force a temporary hiatus, but festering hostilities lurk just below the surface. This is especially true of civil wars in the contemporary world. The stark reality is that no political goal worth achieving can be won through a civil war in the 21^st century, and the costs would be far greater than many seem to imagine.

THE EXTINCTION PROTOCOL: Millions People Will Be Pushed Into Extreme Poverty This Year Owing To The Pandemic, But The Long-term Effects Will Be Even Worse

I have been reminded over and over again about a famous quote of Benjamin Franklin. He said, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty or Safety.” Yet throughout the pandemic, it seems to me that we have been collectively forced to give up our liberty throughout the pandemic, in a somewhat vain search for security.

I’m just going to be very blunt with you. Things have already gotten quite crazy, but they are going to get even crazier.  Global food supplies have already gotten tight, but they are going to get even tighter. When even the UN starts using the word “biblical” to describe the famine that the world is facing, that is a sign that the hour is very late.

Thankfully, we are not facing famine in the short-term here in the United States, but “temporary shortages” of certain items have already been popping up, and food prices are aggressively shooting higher.

Some people seem to think that if they have stored up a couple months’ worth of food that they will be just fine.

Unfortunately, that is not the reality of what we are facing. The truth is that you should have enough food to feed every single person in your household for an extended period, and many of you will need much more than that. Because when things get really crazy, many of the friends, neighbors and extended family members that neglected to prepare will come knocking on your door asking for help.

There are some people that would turn away those friends, neighbors and extended family members, but I couldn’t do that. Yes, they are at fault for refusing to get prepared, but I just couldn’t turn them out into the street.

If you also plan to assist those around you that are in need, that just makes your job even bigger. In the end, there is a limit to what any of us can do, and so we will do what we can with what we have, and we will leave the rest to God.

The overwhelming demand that we are witnessing at food banks around the nation right now gives us some clues about what we can expect as economic conditions get even worse. In Alameda County, vehicles are lining up “as early as seven in the morning” just to get a little bit of food from the local food banks.

They start lining up as early as seven in the morning and this will run for six straight hours – said Altfest.

Hundreds of cars slowly snake their way through the parking lot across from the Acura dealership on Interstate 880. Folks from all walks of life driving everything from Toyota’s, BMW’s, to Mercedes, all coming to get food. Folks are grateful for the charity.

When I read that quote from a local CBS news report, it struck me that it sounded almost exactly like what Heidi Baker said when she saw people waiting in line to get food.

And I saw all these people and they had beautiful cars, 4 by 4’s and Lexus, Mercedes, BMW’s, Toyotas. There they were with fancy shiny cars, but they were standing in line.

On the east coast we are seeing similar things happen.

In fact, there was a quarter-mile line at the break of dawn at a food bank in Queens on Saturday…

The line stretched a quarter mile before the sun was barely up Saturday, snaking around corners like bread lines in the 1930’s. But the hungry in Queens are today’s New Yorkers, left jobless by the corona virus.

Until the pandemic struck the city, La Jornada food pantry used to hand out groceries to roughly 1,000 families a week. Now, the figure tops 10,000. And volunteers serve lunch every day to 1,000 — many of them kids with growling stomachs. Across the five boroughs, the hungry number in the hundreds of thousands, the Food Bank of New York estimates.

I found it quite interesting that the New York Post is comparing what is happening now to the “bread lines in the 1930’s”.

This is the reality of what we are facing people. So many people are already in desperate need, and this “perfect storm” is just getting started.

In the Richmond, Virginia area things are even worse. According to one recent report, vehicles have been lining up at one food bank “as early as six hours” before it opens…

Every Friday, cars line up as early as six hours before the food bank on Iron Bridge Road opens the drive thru. At noon, the first 20 cars or so are allowed to park in the parking lot where they wait another three hours. Once 3 p.m. hits, the operation begins with a slew of volunteers working in the warehouse to fill grocery carts with fresh fruits and vegetables, dairy products, meat, prepared foods, and non-perishable items.

Can you imagine sitting in your vehicle for six hours waiting for a food bank to open?

This is how desperate some people in America have already become.

And as I noted at the beginning of this article, the United Nations is using the word “biblical” to describe the famine and starvation that are coming all around the world.  The following comes from CNBC.

Famines of “biblical proportions” are becoming a serious risk as the corona virus crisis threatens to double the number of people nearing starvation, a U.N. body has warned.

In projections released Tuesday, the UN’s World Food Programme (WFP) predicted that the number of people facing “acute food insecurity” stood to rise to 265 million by the end of this year, up from 135 million in 2021.

I don’t know about you, but I find that warning to be quite sobering.

In a “worst-case scenario”, the UN projects that “about a tenth of the world’s population won’t have enough to eat this year”.

Initial United Nations forecasts show that in a worst-case scenario, about a tenth of the world’s population will not have enough to eat this year. The impact will go beyond just hunger as millions more are also likely to experience other forms of food insecurity, including not being able to afford healthy diets, which can lead to malnutrition and obesity.

Sadly, even though we have already seen so many crazy things happen in 2021, most Americans are still not prepping.

And so, when things really start to unravel in a major way, most of them are going to be short on food and supplies very rapidly.

The other day I was interviewed by Dr. Steve Greene, and we discussed some of the reasons why the troubles that we have experienced so far are just the tip of the iceberg.

So much more is coming, but most people do not want to hear that.

Most Americans still want to believe that the future is going to be just wonderful, and so they see absolutely no need to prepare for the chaotic times that are approaching.

The Drums of War Are Beating Loud for Ukraine - World War III is on the horizon, Russian have been systematically strengthening and updating their strategic forces to strike not only Europe but also the U.S.

More than 125,000 Russian soldiers are now stationed on Ukraine’s doorstep. Another 15,000 Russian separatists are waiting to join their ranks, just over the border in Donetsk and Luhansk.

Tanks and other heavy armor, which are relatively slow to deploy, are in place. Missiles have been brought by train from Siberia, 4,000 miles away.

The probability of a massive armed conflict engulfing Ukraine, and possibly large parts of Europe, has never been this high since the fall of the Soviet Union.

And while the USSR may be long gone, Putin’s imperialist ambitions to rebuild what Ronald Reagan referred to as the “Evil Empire” are starting to show very real and dire consequences for Europe.

At the same time, the U.S. finds itself in the grips of a second Cold War.

And in this one, the Russians have hypersonic nuclear missiles capable of avoiding missile defenses and hitting their intended targets from thousands of miles away while flying at many times the speed of sound.

Putin, who is Russia’s absolute ruler by every measure, strongly believes that “the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.” Yes, he actually said that.

And it’s a catastrophe that he’s been trying to fix ever since he was elected President over two decades ago.

In this article, I’m going to explore the roots of the Russo-Ukrainian crisis we are witnessing, the likelihood of war, how and when it could start, and, most importantly, how this conflict would alter the delicate balance of power on a global scale, threatening not only Europe but also the U.S.

A New Cold War

Over the third weekend of January 2022, Russia and its close ally Belarus hastily announced joint military exercises for early February, and by the 17th of January, Russian troops began pouring into the former Soviet republic. The decision to hold military drills in Belarus seems to be just more saber-rattling at first glance.

However, all you have to do is look at modern Russian military history to know that this is very likely to be the single most decisive step in the preparation for an all-out war with Ukraine.

Today’s crisis has been over a decade in the making, and current circumstances feel eerily reminiscent of what happened back in 2008, in Georgia.

It was called the August War, and although it only lasted for 12 days, historians may come to regard it as the starting point of a new Cold War with Russia. In the early hours of August 8, 2008, as President Vladimir Putin was attending the opening ceremony of yet another Beijing Olympics, the well-oiled Russian war machine swung into action.

A Russian tank column advanced through the Roki tunnel into Georgia while Russian warplanes dropped their deadly payloads on fortified positions of the unsuspecting Georgian military.

Just six days prior, the colossal Kavkaz-2008 military exercise had drawn to a close.

The drill simulated a Russian military operation in a fictitious former Soviet republic, in which they would defend Russian peacekeepers and citizens.

Does that sound familiar?

If it does, that’s probably because it is this exact “casus belli” (reason to declare war) that Russia invoked when it attacked Georgia.

After the Kavkaz exercise ended, the participating soldiers did not return to their barracks.

Instead, they remained stationed on the Georgian frontier and, a few days later, orchestrated the real invasion.

Georgia, a former Soviet vassal, lost two of its territories. The Kremlin signed agreements with the de facto civilian administrations of both territories to integrate them militarily and economically into Russia.

This invasion, which went largely unnoticed by the international community, marked the start of Europe’s first twenty-first century war.

But most importantly, it was Putin’s green light for restoring Russia to its former glory.

He saw that he could start a war and annex new territories without something really bad happening as a result. In the end, the U.S. and European responses were limited to minor and largely symbolic actions.

Annexation of Crimea and the Start of the War with Ukraine

Russia’s prolonged war with Ukraine started all the way back in 2014, in the aftermath of the revolutionary movement that ousted then-president Viktor Yanukovych, who had been accused of catering more to Russia’s interests than to those of his own country. As Yanukovych fled to neighboring Russia on February 21, Kiev’s new rulers issued an arrest warrant for his role in the “mass murder of 88 innocent civilians.”

On February 23-24, 2014, Putin convened an all-night meeting with security service chiefs to discuss the extraction of the deposed Ukrainian president. At the end of the meeting, Putin remarked that “we must start working on returning Crimea back to Russia.”

Just a few days later, on the 27th, masked Russian troops with no distinguishing marks took over the parliament and captured other strategic sites across Crimea.

Again, Putin claimed that he ordered his troops to attack in order to protect Russian nationals living in Crimea, who were under threat from Ukrainian nationalists.

Russia formally incorporated Crimea as two Russian federal subjects—the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol on March 18, 2014. They also moved in nuclear missiles to solidify the new status quo.

According to Putin, “Crimea has always been an integral part of Russia in the hearts and minds of the people,” and retaking control of it corrected an injustice that was done to the Russian Federation in 1954, when the Supreme Soviet of the time gave it to Ukraine, then a Soviet republic.

That same month a guerilla war broke out in the Donbas region of Ukraine. When the Ukrainian military managed to regain control, Russia began a conventional invasion of Donbas.

Again, the same narrative emerged out of the Kremlin: Russia had been forced to deploy troops to defend the Russian-speaking population in Donbas. As a result of the invasion, separatists regained control over much of their lost territory, and things would have escalated even further if it hadn’t been for the ceasefire, which came to be known as the Minsk I Protocol.

It was the first of 29 ceasefires that followed in the coming years. Each of them was supposed to last indefinitely, but none did.

The Drums of War Are Beating Loud for Ukraine

Today a clear parallel emerges with what happened in Georgia and then Crimea. The joint Russian-Belarusian military drills that are taking place right now, just 140 miles of highway away from Ukraine’s capital of Kiev, are set to end by late February.

Will history repeat itself, and will these Russian soldiers cross the border and invade?

Only time will tell.

What we know is that at this moment, Ukraine stands alone. It is not part of the NATO alliance, and despite all the help in military equipment and money offered to bolster its defenses, no European nation will send actual soldiers to help defend it against Russia.

And neither will the U.S.

If Putin decides to invade, it will probably happen in the next couple of weeks, while the frozen winter soil can allow for an armored crossing. It will probably be a multi-pronged attack, coming from Belarus and Russia itself.

With much of Ukraine’s military might concentrated in the far east—where the war with Russian-backed separatists has raged for the last eight years—military experts and Ukraine’s own generals say it will be very difficult for the country to gather the forces necessary to also defend its northern border.

It’s estimated that Russia currently has enough men and firepower at the border to conquer and hold Kiev and large regions of Ukraine but not the whole country.

Putin’s goals are still unclear, and his demands for security guarantees from the West, such as “Ukraine must never be allowed to join the alliance” and “NATO must revert back to its pre-1997 borders,” are almost impossible to agree to.

And Russia’s President probably knows it.

But this might just be the final piece of the puzzle. Putin is looking for a reason to justify going to war with the Ukraine and to continue the work he began years ago of restoring the former URSS.

By looking at how the U.S. and NATO are portrayed as aggressors in the Russian media, and how the country must fight to defend itself from their encroachment near its borders, we could speculate this is the case.

That being said, the alliance has kept expanding east ever since the early 1990s, with no signs of stopping.

For a long time, Russia was too weak to contest this, but not anymore. And one can’t help but think that Russia is really being placed in a difficult position regarding its security and that some of their concerns are justified.

After all, who is NATO supposed to protect against, if not Russia?

Recently Putin declared that the security guarantees he asked for in writing were largely ignored by the U.S. and its allies. And while there are still diplomatic efforts to avert an armed resolution to the crisis in Ukraine, time is quickly running out for a peaceful outcome.

An Impossible Choice for America

There is not much debate at the moment as to whether Ukraine will be able to withstand the Russian invasion.

Most military analysts agree it can’t.

The real question is what will happen once Putin chooses to disregard the West’s threat of economic sanctions and diplomatic exile and goes ahead with the invasion, either overtly or covertly, as he did in Crimea.

NATO will probably have to react in some manner, and the threat of a much bigger, much deadlier conflict will loom over us all.

And should Russia choose to attack any of the post-1997 NATO countries it demands removed from the alliance, the U.S. will be faced with an impossible choice: Intervene and risk a nuclear war, or stay out and lose the faith of all its European allies as well as show the entire world that it is no longer the superpower in once was.

I will end this by sharing another one of Mr. Putin’s remarks about the West.

“They cheated us again and again, made decisions behind our back, presenting us with completed facts. That’s the way it was with the expansion of NATO in the East, with the deployment of military infrastructure at our borders. They always told us the same thing: Well, this doesn’t involve you.”

So, as you can see there two sides to every story.

But the real question is: What do you think America should do in this situation?

The goal of the Global Elites is to enslave and control every human permanently with no chance that they will ever be able to escape

The goal of the rulers of this globe is to enslave and control every human permanently with no chance that they will ever be able to escape. The World Economic Forum’s “Young Global Leaders” program is a totalitarian example of how these sadistic masters will continue to control all of the rest.

Through its Young Global Leaders program, the World Economic Forum has been instrumental in shaping a “new world order” that undermines all democratic principles. For several decades, this program has nurtured compliant leaders acting as WEF agents in governments around the world. The consequences are far-reaching and may turn out to be devastating for humanity.

What most still refuse to realize is that the police employed by the states of several nations, and the military will be needed to ensure obedience compliance to the new world order envisioned by these elitists who believe they have the right to own everyone else. If you dislike that statement, check your cognitive dissonance, and please start applying basic levels of critical thinking to what’s going on. There are no masters if they cannot keep the slaves in line. Who do you think keeps those slaves in line? Wake up.

We need a world with no masters and no slaves, not slaves willing to watch with glee and the master’s punishers roll up and harm others.

In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow. In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders, a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals. The aim was – and still is – to find “suitable” future leaders (masters to rule the slaves)  for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers, and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel) according to a report by Pharos.  This program has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields.

Government is slavery and all those who accept payment in exchange for keeping them in power and all those who vote to keep a ruling class in place consent to be slaves. Sugarcoating is no longer necessary. You either know this or you are their slave. The illusion of freedom is now gone. If you still support those who punish at the request of your master, you are neither awake nor free.

At least try to act like you might want to be free. If not for you, for your children. At timestamp 20:28 to 21:50 in the following video, Zach explains perfectly why service as a police officer or in the military is immoral. Sugarcoating is no longer an option. You need to wake up and do so quickly or you will doom others to slavery in your ignorance.

We have to start to realize what’s going on. Only when we look at information and hear things that may go against our preconceived biases will we grow to learn and understand that bowing as slaves is unacceptable.

We were all born into slavery on a slave planet. The rulers just want to ensure it’s permanent and we cannot escape. Step one to being free is to realize this.

Those that are aware of the machinations unfolding in America today see a potentially deadly situation beginning to unfold. The Stalinist purge of many top ranking military officers and arming of government agencies to insane levels

Those that are aware of the machinations unfolding in America today see a potentially deadly situation beginning to unfold. The talk of detention camps and foreign soldiers being prepositioned. The Stalinist purge of many top ranking military officers and arming of government agencies to insane levels. The slow deterioration of our industrial capability and ability of families to feed themselves. The erosion of civil liberties and government attacks on patriotic Americans. The massive spy network established to contain and control the population. The failure to guard our borders and dismantling of our military. All of these actions lead in one direction.

For those who think that a financial collapse causing the loss of their savings and livelihood are the worst that could happen, they might want to consider this possibility.

The global elite that have their hand on all the switches know how individualistic and enterprising many Americans are. If this country were destroyed economically and our infrastructure were destroyed we have the ability to rebuild it all over time. Many of the global players know that a small core of Americans can never be subjugated and could cause many problems for years to come if left to their own devices. In a country as big as America it would be almost impossible to round up all of them so something more drastic may be needed.

Let us not forget the goal of some to return the Earth to a population of 500 million. This means the eradication of 7.5 billion people. Why would Americans think they are exempt from this depopulation event.

The first thing we all need to recognize is that the catastrophes are being engineered. The covid bioweapon was created in a lab. The vaccine was developed to intentionally achieve depopulation. The “great reset” of the financial system is being planned by the wealthy bankers. Even the floods, droughts and crop failures are mostly the result of weather weapons. The second thing we all need to recognize is that they’re “stacking” the catastrophes on top of each other in order to achieve maximum devastation.

It has been said before that the goal of an economic collapse would be to not only take America down to third world levels but even lower so Americans would have no chance to rebuild and cause the globalists any serious problems in the future. Even with a collapse much of our infrastructure and knowledge and raw materials would still be available to rebuild.

The goal of Agenda 21 is to return large portions of the land to wilderness and eliminate the human element in these places. When you start to look at the things that some want to happen here a frightening picture begins to form.

– Destroy economy and peoples wealth
– Destroy infrastructure and return land to wilderness
– Destroy peoples ability to rebuild
– Destroy population to return to sustainable global levels

The only things under human control that could do all of these things is a global pandemic of biblical proportions or a major world war. Either or both could be in the works at this time.

The elite have made no secret that they wish to destroy American hegemony at all costs. A pandemic would certainly accomplish many of the goals listed but it is not guaranteed. Even some survivors would be capable of rebuilding some of the nation and that possibility is not acceptable.

The other option is a major war. As any person who knows the history of WWII and the destruction of Europe knows, destruction of people and materials through warefare is very effective. The end of WWII saw the U.S. as the most powerful nation left standing because we came out of it relatively unscathed. Our vaults were full of gold and our factories were second to none.

That cannot be allowed to happen again in America so the next war must bring total destruction to this land.

America will likely be exposed to an attack so fierce that nothing will remain to rebuild. A force that occupies the nation and systematically reduces the population through a series of initiatives from bullets to chemical weapons to starvation will help to accomplish the Agenda 21 result. If the globalists really want to reduce the world population do you really think they will leave all Americans standing?

They will destroy or remove any and all equipment that allows people to survive and care for themselves long term. They will remove any resources that they can use and destroy the rest. Essentially a scorched earth policy will unfold in America that leaves a barren wilderness unable to sustain any large group of people. When that is accomplished the destroyers will likely go home to some large degree. The mineral resources here are well known and can be extracted any time the globalists want in the future.

When they are done all that will remain of this nation will be a vast wilderness with a few scattered people with no ability to confront the globalists. It will be much as it was when the Europeans fist set foot here.

For those willing to sacrifice and do the hard work it may still be possible to salvage the nation from this destruction. For those with the indomitable spirit to go on and rebuild it is possible for this phoenix to rise again from the ashes. But for that to happen, some things will have to be preserved from the destruction to allow a new start.

– raw materials such as scrap metal and chemicals
– knowledge in the form of professionals and books
– equipment for building in the form of machining equipment
– basic medical equipment
– equipment for casting and refining
– equipment to make copper wire
– farm equipment and implements that can be duplicated
– livestock that can be bred and expanded
– seed stocks that can be grown and processed
– equipment to process fibers for cloth and rope
– electrical equipment such as generators and communications gear

No one person could store all of these things so it must fall on multiple groups with various knowledge and abilities to preserve this core of technological abilities. These items would have to be literally buried to escape detection and destruction for the duration of the event. That is possible if done in time and right now time grows short.

For many it would be easy to hide some resources for later use to rebuild and enjoy a rustic lifestyle without all of the technology. The only problem with that is eventually you may be faced with the spectre of the destroyers returning and any lone homesteads with little technological means would be easy prey for another assault. The only way to rebuild and expand with the ability to defend is to establish communities that are connected and technologically capable.

The scenario laid out here is not a happy one but it is survivable if actions are taken in time. Only the hardiest of individuals would likely live through something like this but they are the ones that history calls nation builders. To dismiss this scenario as impossible is to do so at your own peril should events come to pass. Something is impossible until it’s not.

The COUP appears to have failed, while all the apparatchiks are still in place. A preliminary proposal to fix the mess

 I’ll assume you have been reading my blog and agree with me that an attempt at gaining world domination is at this very moment failing.  

It required a deadly pandemic, vaccines that actually worked, and the ability to snooker billions of people into believing that the responses of the government were logical, beneficial and well-intentioned.

It required keeping people separated from each other, communicating primarily via easily surveilled devices.

It required keeping people frightened and distrustful of one another.

It required loosening or destroying the bonds between family members.

It required uniform messaging by virtually all mass media.

It required making doctors and patients distrust one another, while yet submitting to government-enforced medical edicts, denying us the ability to act within any normal doctor-patient relationship.

It required a profound fear of death and loss, enough to supercede our normal instincts regarding loyalty, interpersonal relationships and friendship.

It required massive carrots and sticks to enforce a uniform narrative, against all data (most of which was persistently rigged) and the surrender of common sense.

The carrots came mostly in the form of taxpayer dollars.  In the US, $trillions have been spent since the start of the pandemic to enforce government lockdown edits, masks, distancing, vaccinations… The list could go on and on.

No doubt plenty was spent before the pandemic as the chess pieces (crooks) were moved into place to get ready for the coup, under the guise of a medical emergency.

Fauci was already there.  He moved Walensky in to control CDC.  Janet Woodcock was made acting FDA Commissioner, and FDA sat without a a Presidentially-appointed Commissioner for an entire year.  Presumably the coup leaders had no one else who could be trusted to ruthlessly carry out every needed act.  Such FDA acts included issuing and then revoking EUAs to confuse the public over HCQ; doing a bait and switch with a Comirnaty license; then suing to prevent release of the licensing data, which no doubt failed to justify an EUA, let alone a license.

Here is one reasonable proposal for a way forward.  Trillions were doled out to industry, schools, federal agencies, media etc. to get them to fall in line and do whatever was required.

These were federal contracts.  We have the contracts.  Simply require every entity that got paid off to give the money back to the federal treasury. Or, they can keep some of it if they clean up their act.  Can’t pay it back?  Ever heard of debtors’ prison?

Bring in Catherine Austin Fitts as overseer to stop the flow of funds to the criminal coups members and make sure it remains accountable to the people, rather than accessible to the Bankers.

The Fed and all its member banks will need an immediate audit.  Their role in managing federal monies must end. Private companies that manage federal accounts will also need to be immediately audited, and their functions brought back under federal control. Every entity doing business with the federal or state government must become wholly accountable (subject to FOIA etc.) and their business made transparent.  Fort Knox needs an audit.  Can the paybacks be made in precious metals and stored there?

Will media figure out how to stop lying and fearmongering?  I think they could solve that in a heartbeat if it meant they did not have to return all the money. 

What about schools?  Could they ditch bogus curricula, mask mandates, plexiglass, vaccine mandates, testing…if the alternative was returning $190 billion dollars to the federal treasury?  

Emergency rules at the state level:  rescind them immediately or return the federal grants to states and state agencies. Give the states a choice.  

Remove the chief medical officers of every hospital and state agency, every state CDC, and HHS Department.  All federal executive agencies. Have the deputies take over immediately.  Pay the former agency heads their prior salary if they take on their new role:  documenting all the methods by which martial law was imposed.  Later they can go through a truth and reconciliation process.  Based on South Africa’s example, if they fully spill the beans, they are pardoned.  If not, they stand trial for their crimes.  The deputies must also spill their beans, btw.

Honesty, kindness and consideration for one’s fellow man will become the new norms that are praised by society.  Greed will not be seen as something to aspire to, and the tax structure will disincentivize greed.  Under JFK, those paying the highest marginal tax rate had to part with 91% of their top earnings.  We can do that again; why not?  The tax structure is what allowed the Gateses and Bezoses and their ilk to amass the ill-gotten gains.  The tax structure can also take away.

Antitrust prosecutions will be undertaken unless large corporations break themselves up in an approved manner.

We can do this.  Let’s just be creative and fair.  There are plenty of models around to draw ideas from.  Let’s move carefully and deliberately back from the abyss.

And paper ballots, with identifiable markings and no scans or electrified ballots, will be all that is acceptable, with video cameras documenting the vote counts.  Votes cannot be moved around–they will be counted where they are cast.  Absentee ballots will require a visit to a public office with ID, preceding the date of any election. 

Courts will be established to review initial information re corruption very quickly on members of Congress and other critical figures; if there is reasonable evidence of malfeasance, they will have to take a leave from office while the evidence is weighed.

Shut down all the BSL 3 and 4 labs and secure their contents before any more deadly pandemics “leak” out.  Put competent biologists in charge of each to establish what they contain and what the scientific goals of its researchers were.

Want to solve climate change?  It can be done with the stroke of a pen.  Change tariffs.  Add a 20% extra tax to every item coming into the US from overseas.   If that doesn’t solve it, make it 30%.  Once it becomes more economic to make things in your own country, you put your own people back to work.  You reduce all the tankers and airplanes carrying freight halfway across the world.

Add an additional tariff on every item that is not expected to last under normal use for 5 years. Disposable-after-one-use items will have a 100% tariff placed on them.  That should get rid of planned obsolescence.  Double fees for garbage disposal.  Recycling will become economic again.

UPDATE.  Here is how Big Pharma fell in line.

Right now we have a crooked Justice Department that only wants to obtain fines and has made these fines the cost of doing business–no CEOs go to jail.

Well, once upon a time a few did go to jail, and the rest immediately caved.  Here is what you do.  The AG of Florida, for example, could begin charging corporations headquartered there with crimes, and fail to offer bail to CEOs, CFOs.  You stay in jail until you are found innocent or guilty.  These CEOs aren’t Martha Stewart.  No backbone.  I think they will spill the beans, and fast.

Share this: